Will there be any issues with the ai generator checker?

The ai generator checker may encounter the following issues:
The technological paradox and reliability issues of detection tools: Current artificial intelligence detection tools essentially mimic human writing styles, thus there are fundamental logical problems. For example, using AI detection tools to determine whether text was generated by AI is like measuring a thermometer itself with a thermometer, and this self referencing detection method lacks reliability. In addition, some detection tools have low accuracy, such as OpenAI's detection tool with an accuracy of only 26%.
Inhibition of creative expression: Detection tools may misjudge some highly creative content as generated by AI, thereby inhibiting true creative expression. For example, classic literary works such as "Moonlight over the Lotus Pond" have been misjudged as having a high AI rate, which is actually a misunderstanding and misjudgment of literary creation.
User doubts about the test results: Due to the lack of transparency and standards in the testing tools, it is difficult for users to prove their innocence. The detection results of tools often lack clear basis and explanation, and users cannot determine their fairness and accuracy.
Technical limitations and misjudgments: AI detection tools may make errors when processing complex text, such as being unable to correctly handle referenced content or complex language structures. This may lead to misjudgment and unnecessary disputes.
User dependence and abuse of detection tools: Some students overly rely on AI tools for paper writing, leading to a decline in paper quality. Although detection tools can recognize AI generated text, they cannot guarantee the overall quality and originality of the paper.